<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PeerGuardian: now with viruses!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoenixlabs.org/2008/02/21/peerguardian-now-with-viruses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoenixlabs.org/2008/02/21/peerguardian-now-with-viruses/</link>
	<description>Creators of PeerGuardian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:56:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Virus Company Says PeerGuardian is Malware &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>http://phoenixlabs.org/2008/02/21/peerguardian-now-with-viruses/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Virus Company Says PeerGuardian is Malware &#124; TorrentFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoenixlabs.org/?p=40#comment-9867</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phoenixlabs, which makes PeerGuardian, put out this statement in response. Their representatives would not comment further on the subject, referring only to the statement. Bluetack, on the other hand, have been very vocal about it. &#8216;m00re&#8217; said â€œwhomever the person/persons are that made the flawed decision to maliciously target a non threatening application like PG2 is clearly a moron.â€? whilst &#8216;firstaid&#8217; suggested that â€œpeople call them and have them stop having their product remove PG2 from their systems.â€? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
